Global Knowledge Management System and critical success factors

Global business and marketing system has already entered the knowledge management system .Using the KM lessons which are learned from early adopters, many organizations have effectively provide their employees the tools as the require for managing and sharing knowledge. However, it is easy to forget in the share system with some important elements to account for the knowledge.Global Knowledge Management System and critical success factors

To have a common understanding of knowledge management (KM) is an early success factor terms are “Knowledge Management” and “Knowledge Sharing” and how do they apply to situation and needs. Because they do not use these terms are not accepted within some organizations choose to culture. Acknowledging the fact that a key success factor of KM is an organization are different to one another .check out the Global Knowledge Management System and critical success factors.

Listen to employees and customers :-

Definition of wind too has evolved since the mid-1990s. It started just as valuable information action in which the price is determined by the organization and the recipient. Although this definition is still today, more rigorous discipline that has been developed in the same holds true under investigation other business processes within an organization and a Return on Investment (ROI) are likely to show. APQC as m making strategies and approaches to protect, and to use that defines a set of emerging knowledge assets (including people and information), which allows knowledge to flow right people at the right time so they create more value for the enterprise can be applied to these assets.

Global critical success factors of KM :-

Some congenital critical success factors are built into the definition. KM is a set of strategies and approach, which is one way to do things a certain structure or meaning. Another important piece of this definition for the right person at the right time, this approach enables the flow of information; Otherwise, simply to manage the organization and management of their knowledge is not to create value. Which brings us to the most important aspect of this definition: creating more value for enterprise. If knowledge is shared within the wider knowledge sharing processes will not help value to an organization, the recipient (s) or increase revenue through time or it is not enabled.

Global cost savings factors :-

Many factors, our control, nothing from the success of the initiative depends on the wind. Typically, critical success factors can be classified into five primary categories:

1. Leadership :-

Leadership within an organization to ensure success in almost any initiative plays an important role. The effects because it is a relatively new discipline km is even more obvious. Nothing makes more than when leaders model the behavior they are trying to promote the influence on an organization employees. Buckman Laboratories, a chemical company’s CEO for the KM Champions organization and individually within its Knowledge Bank for reviews submissions. When she notices a particular employee had not been active within the system, it sends a message that reads:
“Dear Associate, you will not be shared knowledge. How can we help? All the best, Bob. ” Many other organizations have demonstrated this commitment to the practice km. The World Bank, President promoted the development of a support infrastructure that led to the creation of support . Practice (COP) not only throughout the organization, but also communities around the world. Today, The World Bank, through its police persisted KM initiative. The knowledge managers consistently search for new approaches to knowledge sharing. Although the lead time plays an important role in the success of the initiative, “culture” factor can be Is even more important to the success of wind.

2. Culture of global business with KM :-

Culture, shared history, expectations, unwritten rules and social mores that the combination of forced behavior. The underlying assumptions that rarely expressed at all, there are the usual set of actions affect perception and communication to all employees. No initiatives concerning cultural issues usually arise due to the factors:

3. Roles, and responsibilities structure :-

Effectively. You must save the processes, techniques and roles were created during a time initiative staff time, not burden them with more work. This can be accomplished only if employees accounted for pattern during the initial design and planning phase of initiative.

4. Information technology infrastructure :-

Organizations unconnected reward systems – to maintain a balance between internal and clear rewards to encourage employee behavior. Clearly the most effective use of award at the beginning of a wind initiative is to encourage sharing. If attendees can not find the meetings in either the value or the system will retain information on incentives .

5. Global business measurement :-

Measurement is one of the most critical factor of global knowledge management because it will give all the data about failure or success in any business establishment.Most people fear measurement because they see it as synonymous with ROI, and they are not sure how to link KM efforts to ROI. Although the ultimate goal of measuring the effectiveness of a KM initiative is to determine some type of ROI, there are many intervening variables that also affect the outcomes. Because many variables may affect an outcome, it is important to correlate KM activities with business outcomes, while not claiming a pure cause-and-effect relationship. Increased sales may be a result not only of the sales representatives having more information, but also of the market turning, a competitor closing down, or prices dropping 10 percent. Due to the inability to completely isolate knowledge-sharing results, tracking the correlations over time is important.

Final thoughts of author :-

There is a final imperative concerning critical success factors, which transcends KM and applies to all
interactions: Listen! Listen to your users, customers, and managers-whichever audience for which you
are designing. They will tell you how you can meet their needs and have a successful KM initiative.

Reference /source :-

# Farida Hasanali , ” Knowledge Management, Lessons Learned” published by ASIS&T
Monograph Series.

# Rockart, John F., “Chief executives define their own data needs”, Harvard Business Review 1979 (2), pages 81-93.
# Boynlon, A.C., and Zmud, R.W. 1984. “An Assessment of Critical Success Factors,” Sloan Management Review (25:4), pp. 17-27.
# Daniel, D. Ronald, “Management Information Crisis,” Harvard Business Review, Sept.-Oct., 1961.
# Rockart, John F. “Chief Executives Define their Own Data Needs” published in “Harvard Business Review” March 1979
# Rockart, John F. “A Primer on Critical Success Factors” published in The Rise of Managerial Computing: The Best of the Center for Information Systems Research, edited with Christine V. Bullen. (Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin), 1981, OR, McGraw-Hill School Education Group (1986)
# Johnson, James A. and Michael Friesen (1995). The Success Paradigm: Creating Organizational Effectiveness Through Quality and Strategy New York: Quorum Books. ISBN 978-0-89930-836-4

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *